More polarizing words from homeless activists

Here’s an excerpt from Greg Zaller in an “other voices” in The Union:

“Dan Miller said, ‘I came away convinced that Nevada County could use a 24/7 facility so the homeless population can access the services and programs that are offered. We need to work together as a community with common goals that we all agree on to end homelessness.’”

“If you see any of the attendees listed below around town, please congratulate them for looking outside the ‘box’ and ask them what they learned.

“Nevada County: Supervisor Dan Miller and Supervisor-elect Heidi Hall, Director of Human Services Michael Haggerty, Behavioral Health’s Michele Violet; Nevada City Council member Reinette Senum, City Manager Mark Prestwich, Police Officer Shane Franssen; Grass Valley Council members Lisa Swarthout and Jan Arbuckle.

“Also attending were Pauli Halstead of Streicher House (trip organizer), Divine Spark’s Shirley Kinghorn; Dee Dinelli of Sierra Roots, Lew Sitzer; and myself.”

Then it concludes:

“Hospitality House, our local overnight shelter, was invited to attend the tour but did not return our calls.”

Why would you include a dig like that? It is unconstructive and shows the ongoing efforts to polarize, not collaborate, when it comes to helping the homeless in our community. Let’s not forget that Hospitality House landed a $1 million grant that led to the creation of Utah’s Place. Its founders have been “doers.” Show some respect for that.

Podunk.

Author: jeffpelline

Jeff Pelline is a veteran editor and award-winning journalist - in print and online. He is publisher of Sierra FoodWineArt magazine and its website SierraCulture.com. Jeff covered business and technology for The San Francisco Chronicle for years, was a founding editor and Editor of CNET News, and was Editor of The Union, a 145-year-old newspaper in Grass Valley. Jeff has a bachelor's degree from UC Berkeley and a master's from Northwestern University. His hobbies include sailing and trout fishing.

15 thoughts on “More polarizing words from homeless activists”

  1. I have contacted the Rood Center to see if they agree with Greg Zaller’s cheap shot at Hospitality House reading “Hospitality House, our local overnight shelter, was invited to attend the tour but did not return our calls.” I’ll keep you posted on the response.

  2. HH has been the “Little Red Hen”, working for the homeless for a long time and perhaps doesn’t wish to partner with the newcomers.
    That is their prerogative.

    1. Cindy Maple, the former executive director of Hospitality House, will be sharing her response on her Facebook page later today.

  3. And I heard back from the Rood Center and will be getting an official response soon on Greg Zaller’s “Other Voices.” Methinks Greg stepped in it. lol.

  4. Here is the Rood Center’s response directed at Greg Zaller’s snarkish remark about the Hospitality House in his “Other Voices.”

    “The County values Hospitality House as an important community partner in providing homeless services. We value the work of their Board and staff. Permanent housing for those who are homeless in our community is the ultimate goal. Achieving this goal will take an inclusive community approach with government and non-profits working together.”
    Alison Lehman
    Assistant County Executive Officer

    “HH is a critical partner to HHSA and a welcome provider of safety net emergency shelter services in Nevada County. They offer high quality shelter and food to 55 homeless individuals and families every night. In addition, HH case managers have been very successful in placing HH guests into permanent housing, utilizing the evidenced based rapid rehousing model.”

    Michael Heggarty, MFT
    Nevada County Health and Human Services Agency Director

  5. And here is the response from Cindy Maple, former executive director of Hospitality House:

    When Hospitality House was awarded a million dollar grant, we still needed to raise $700,000 for renovations. Area contractors donated $200,000 in labor leaving HH to raise the additional $500,000. The building sat empty for a year while we raised this money. All of it was raised from community donations, and HH is still paying on private loans. HH did not receive one single time of local government money for this project though I asked, several times.

    City Council member Lisa Swarthout was the only elected official to show up to meetings when we needed help dealing with the State because they didn’t want to release our grant funds unless our construction was done with prevailing wages, which would have bumped the cost up another quarter million dollars.

    Assistant County CEO Alison Lehman, an advocate of HH, connected us to the county lobbyist for help. We fought them on this and won. They have since abolished this requirement for shelters. This is just one of many battles we fought for this building.

    By the time we moved in to Utah’s Place in Dec 2013, the same week two major grants were due that would help us run our shelter and housing programs, I was sick and exhausted beyond what I’ve ever been in my life. I won’t even touch on what this did to our board president Joanna Robinson because that’s not my story to tell, but it was just as brutal.

    In spite of the exhaustion, I still showed up because we had a program to develop and a new shelter to run. I had a vision of all we could do to help people that included a culinary job training program and other healing workshops. These would all happen during the time the shelter was closed and would give people the tools they needed to end their homelessness.

    When the 24/7 model recommend by homeless consultant Marbut was discussed, I deeply opposed it for HH because we needed the space for these workshops. I also believe we need to empower people to end their homelessness. And our program was/is doing this. HH has had success after success with people who have graduated from our job training and housing programs.

    So to you Mr. Zaller I say this – HH is at the table, more so, we were the first ones there. Your constant digs at HH in order to promote your own beliefs don’t help promote working together.

    It was HH that called the first meeting to try and bring all the groups together last year and during this meeting I urged everyone to join our local Homeless Continuum of Care. Years prior to this, it was HH (myself and board president Don Lee) that met with Placer County officials to learn how to start and operate a CoC.

    We didn’t know then that State regulations would change and that a CoC would actually be a requirement for homeless agencies competing for funds. We didn’t know then how much money we (county and homeless agencies) would bring into this county through our CoC. At the time, we just want a collaboration of county, nonprofits and community.

    Following is an excerpt from our current County Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness-

    “ – As a result of the homeless count and the surveys collected, Hospitality House challenged our community, “to actively build a coalition among a broad spectrum of individuals, congregations and community organizations. Through sharing knowledge and experience and working cooperatively with service providers, we can effectively address the problems of homelessness. Through this shared community participation, organizations can learn to better identify the causes of homelessness and advocate for solutions.”

    We all agree more is needed. We all agree services for psychiatric care and addiction are sorely lacking. We all agree the lack of affordable housing and living wage jobs are at the root of our homeless crisis. I’m delighted to see people at the table working to solve this. But as a person who was one of the first on the front lines of this crisis in Nevada County, I have something to say about what I read today.

    Dan Miller thinks a 24/7 shelter is needed. I say to you Mr. Miller, where were you when we were trying to raise an additional half million dollars? I’m guessing you weren’t at home crying yourself to sleep at night because you were utterly depleted from trying to raise this money while also operating the only emergency shelter in Nevada County. Where was our local government then?

    Okay, so fast forward. They (government) are at the table now. Great. Perhaps that’s because they are under fire at the moment because homelessness is such a hot topic, but at least they are there. But here’s my take – They (local government) are looking for something they can put their stamp on so it looks like they are finally doing something. Dan Miller thinks a 24/7 shelter is needed. Maybe so, but it will not solve the problem of homelessness for people. Only services and housing will do this. Only a living wage will do this.

    HH is already doing their part with great success.

    If Dan Miller thinks a 24/7 shelter is needed, by all means, fund one like Placer County did. We certainly still have enough unsheltered homeless people to fill another shelter (several shelters actually because there are easily two hundred plus unsheltered homeless people in Nevada County). And as an interesting side note to this-Dan Miller attended and spoke at the HH open house as the mayor of Grass Valley. Since opening he has not visited or toured Utah’s Place (at least not during my time which was up until June of this year).

    HH is only 54 beds. HH can’t fix the homeless crisis in Nevada County.

    Adding hours won’t enhance the work being done nor is the shelter capable of taking more people off the streets. So if this statement was intended to be directed at HH (and I’ve heard this is so), and how HH should change to adopt this model, consider this – HH has helped house hundreds of homeless people over the years through a grant HH applied for from the State in a competitive process (hundreds of thousands of dollars was brought to Nevada County to help house our homeless because of the efforts of HH).

    The culinary job training program is giving people skills they need to join the workforce and now the Bread and Roses Thrift Store is doing the same with its job training program. Both with great success.

    I’m not sure how a 24/7 program at HH would improve on that.

    This model would deprive the HH program of the space needed for life skills and job training workshops. Seems to me, a 54 bed shelter that’s already doing great work should not come under fire, ever.

    From what I’ve heard, the county wants to take the easy way out by putting this on HH and this is simply not right.

    In response to HH not attending the COTs tour, there is no fluff at HH in terms of staff. Everyone is working every single minute and at the moment with only an interim Director. They are simply too busy doing the work.

    The COTS program in Sonoma County (a county with a homeless task force and one that provides funding for shelters) is a great program and I’ve been following it for years. HH has a similar program, similar success, only it isn’t a 24/7 model.

    If you look at the data- in 2015 Sonoma County counted 3107 homeless people. Of this number, 20% were in an emergency shelter, 13 % were in emergency housing, and a whopping 67% were unsheltered (2070 of this population). In 2009 Sonoma counted 3247 homeless people and in 2015 the count was 3107.

    I’m not sharing this to say COTS and other programs in this county aren’t doing amazing work. They are changing lives. I’m sharing this because the numbers of homeless people are dramatic in spite of all this good work. We are not seeing the numbers decrease because we don’t have resources and housing for people. And many homeless people fortunate enough to find housing need long term case management to help them retain it.

    Of the 3107 homeless people Sonoma County counted in 2015, 67% said they were homeless because they couldn’t afford rent, 57% said they had no job or income, 23% said they didn’t have money for move-in costs. 44% said they had a disabling condition, the highest percentage of this stating they had a psychiatric disorder or an addiction.

    How does a 24/7 shelter model help these folks? What will help?

    We need to keep their feet to the fire (local government). If they want to provide funding to help the current programs at HH with no strings attached like Placer County has done for The Gathering Inn, that would be pretty great, otherwise, it’s a day late and 500,000 dollars short.

    In my opinion, the best thing elected officials could do right now is either fund a second shelter that would operate 24/7 or take that money and fund a low-income tiny house village. A strategic plan to develop more low-income housing is also needed.

    Don’t be fooled into thinking pushing HH into becoming a 24/7 model will fix anything. It would only hurt a successful program.

    I no longer work for Hospitality House so these are just my opinions. I left because there was so much controversy and criticism my spirit finally broke and I have still not recovered emotionally or physically from this. For years I remained fairly silent about the lack of support from local government because for me this wasn’t a political issue, it was always a human issue, and I always hoped they would eventually join us in the fight to end homelessness.

    I do want to acknowledge that the county does allow a worker to visit the shelter every week for public assistance applications, and they have provided HH with an onsite therapist 20 hours a week through MHSA funds (thanks solely to Alison Lehman following through on this).

    But while this is great for our guests, and so appreciated, money is also needed. Money keeps the lights on. If local government is indeed at the table (and I’m sure this is the case for Lisa, supervisor Heidi Hall and Alison Lehman), I hope you will help lead the fight against homelessness in the direction it needs to go – housing and services.

    A final note:
    Any person can go to county and city websites and read the local housing element which is the document where each municipality addresses homelessness and affordable housing and what they are doing about it. Read them if you want to know for yourself what local government is doing.
    …. Read them.

  6. This is Russ Steele’s idea of a correction and an apology for his earlier false statements:
    “Refernce my 10:10AM
    Jeff writes to set the record stratight, his wife did not lose the contract, they chose not to bid on the renewal. No reason given, we will all have to just wonder if mabe the competition was just too overwhelming, or they were just tired of trying to turn a sows ear into a valuable leather purse.”

    BTW, we chose not to bid on this contract because our own business is expanding, and we struck a new contract with Placer County to publish their Visitor Guide — a bigger county. Here’s a link to the letter we received from the Nevada County Supes, citing our excellent work: https://sierrafoothillsreport.com/2016/11/18/county-board-of-supervisors-thanks-our-business-for-tourism-efforts/

    Russ, Barry and the local right wingnuts (AKA “deplorables”) have been hounding our family since 2011 on this contract — to no avail. YubaNet’s reporting on the issue is here: http://yubanet.com/regional/nevada-county-bos-process1-politics-0/

    By comparison, I wonder how their year went? roflol.

  7. From Scott Thurmond, Interim Executive Director for Hospitality House
    We were part of the email progression regarding the trip to COTS. Our lead shelter staff person planned to attend but was sick on day of trIp. We are aware of the of the conclusions of the trip and have been communicating with attendees regarding potential next steps. As we have historically been, Hospitality House is dedicated to continuing to find solutions to serve the homeless in our county while sheltering 54 men, women and children on a daily basis.

    1. Thanks Scott. As it turns out the comment ““Hospitality House, our local overnight shelter, was invited to attend the tour but did not return our calls” was an even bigger cheap shot that I thought. Deplorable!

  8. Jeff,
    I looked up “droll” and noticed the nuances of meaning.
    I was referring to the more archaic meaning, ” a fool or buffoon”.

    1. Saw that drivel. I guess Pat doesn’t remember burning crosses, racist comments toward the first family, and childish cartoons upon Obama’s election. I didn’t vote for him but I certainly didn’t have the hissy fit behavior as mentioned above.

      1. The Union’s demographics reflect our aging, declining population, so its letter writers are “retreads.” Pat Lane is a shining example.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s