Grass Valley to defer impact fees for Wolf Creek Village project?

Here’s one that slipped by the local media: Though facing a budget crisis of its own, the City of Grass Valley is recommending that the Council temporarily defer some development impact fees for the initial phase of the Wolf Creek Village project. The decision is expected at Tuesday’s regularly scheduled council meeting.

Though I understand the tough economic times and am a big fan of this project, I always wonder about the wisdom of this “rules are made to be broken” mindset.

Though the circumstances always differ, think of examples such as Dark Horse in the unincorporated county or Walgreen’s in Grass Valley when a project falls short of completion — despite the best of intentions. Then “we the people” are on the hook. It’s the “electeds” job to guard against this.

These impact fees are to pay for services (drainage, fire, park and recreation) provided by the City-and County once residents move in.

“The unexpected 2-year delay when our financing went on hold has made the project budget especially tight,” according to a letter send to the city by the developer. “We estimate paying the impact fees at the end of construction instead of when we pull building permits will save the project approximately $10,000 in interest on the bank loan.”

It adds, “We do not believe it is appropriate to have to pay these fees 18 months before residents move in.”

“In 2008, when we thought we are the verge of starting construction before the banking collapse, the project paid $237,942 in water and sewer fees, $21,562 in Quimby Act Fees, $13,362 in Regional Traffic Fees, $75,181 in school fees, and $65,037 in building department plan check fees. We have now had to pay two years of additional interest on the funds used to pay these fees. In the last two years, the impact and other city fees remaining to be paid have increased by $28,000. This has put additional hardships on the project.”

Author: jeffpelline

Jeff Pelline is a veteran editor and award-winning journalist - in print and online. He is publisher of Sierra FoodWineArt magazine and its website SierraCulture.com. Jeff covered business and technology for The San Francisco Chronicle for 12 years, and he was a founding editor and Editor of CNET News for eight years, among other positions. Jeff has a bachelor's degree from UC Berkeley and a master's from Northwestern University. His hobbies include sailing, swimming, and trout fishing in the Sierra.

3 thoughts on “Grass Valley to defer impact fees for Wolf Creek Village project?”

  1. If I lived in Grass Valley (within the city limit) I would have a big problem doing a special deal for one developer and not others. Can you say lawsuit?

    The LAST thing a city needs right now is a further cut in revenue for the very thing you mentioned, and frankly, a lot more important but less visible socialist departments and divisions. Can you say loose your next election?

  2. Read that last paragraph . . . the city and other government entities have been earning interest for at least two years without having to spend a dime to support an unbuilt project. The request sounds reasonable. . . . don’t get selfish here.

  3. This developer did the same thing in Nevada City. Once the project was approved they came back and were constantly trying to re-negotiate fees and conditions of approval. One big concession Nevada City gave them was instead of individual water meters for each unit sold (required), they were allowed to put in only one meter like multi family units.

    If you do it for this developer you can’t deny the same request from other developers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: