Australia scoops us to 2012 (again)!

I throughly enjoyed last year — despite the drumbeat of “nattering naybobs of negativism” — and know I’ll be enjoying 2012 more. I’ve been working away this weekend (on my own clock), but popping open a bottle of Sierra Starr bubbly tonight, and we’re joining friends for some “low and slow” ribs on the “Big Green Egg” and champagne tomorrow. Then the beloved Rose Parade on Monday.

It’s been fun having our son at home all day for two weeks. All the nephews are home too. We’ve been celebrating Christmas since Thanksgiving, it seems.

A year-in-review — AKA “The Year in Crazy” — from The Chronicle’s virtual cartoonist Mark Fiore is here. “Everything must go!” he states.

Happy New Year to all the Sierra Foothills Report readers!

A year-in-review for this blog

Editor’s note: I received this report from WordPress about Sierra Foothills Report. I’m happy to share it, being a fan of publishing transparency:

•London Olympic Stadium holds 80,000 people. This blog was viewed about 520,000 times in 2011. If it were competing at London Olympic Stadium, it would take about 7 sold-out events for that many people to see it.

•In 2011, there were 1,459 new posts, growing the total archive of this blog to 4,117 posts. There were 859 pictures uploaded, taking up a total of 303mb. That’s about 2 pictures per day.

•The busiest day of the year was March 15th with 3,147 views. The most popular post that day was “How The Union makes light of racism in our community.”

•The top referring sites in 2011 were:
•ncvoices.us
•facebook.com
•sacbee.com
•wordpress.com
•sz0126.ev.mail.comcast.net

•Your most commented on post in 2011 was “Sierra Foothills Report on hiatus for two weeks.”

These were your 5 most active commenters:
1. John Stoos, 2539 comments
2. kate, 1913 comments
3. Ben Emery, 1587 comments
4. Steve Frisch, 1477 comments
5. Douglas Keachie, 796 comments

•These are the posts that got the most views in 2011:

1. How The Union makes light of racism in our community — 44 comments, March 2011
2. 9/11 Budweiser Clydesdales commercial – shown just once — 15 comments, September 2011
3. Sierra Foothills Report on hiatus for two weeks — 217 comments, August 2011
4. “No you can’t be Charlie Sheen for Halloween”! — 0 comments, March 2011
5. Craigslist, eBay flooded with Burning Man tickets — 15 comments, July 2011

Why the GOP crackup is bad for America

“With the Iowa caucuses just days away, the Republican crack-up threatens the future of the Grand Old Party more profoundly than at any other time since the GOP’s eclipse in 1932,” Robert Reich, who has served in three presidential administrations, writes on his blog. “That’s bad for America.”

“The crack-up isn’t just Romney-the-smooth versus Gingrich-the-bomb-thrower. Not just House Speaker John Boehner, who keeps making agreements he can’t keep, versus House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, who keeps making trouble he can’t control. And not just the GOP establishment versus the Tea Partiers.

“The underlying conflict lies deep in the nature and structure of the Republican Party. And its roots are very old.

“As political analyst Michael Lind has noted, today’s Tea Party is less an ideological movement than the latest incarnation of an angry white minority – predominantly Southern, mainly rural, largely male – that has repeatedly attacked American democracy in order to get its way.

“It’s no coincidence that the states responsible for putting the most Tea Party representatives in the House are all former members of the Confederacy. Others are from border states with significant Southern populations and Southern ties.

“And the views separating these Republicans from Republicans elsewhere mirror the split between self-described Tea Partiers and other Republicans.

“In a poll of Republicans conducted for CNN last September, nearly six in ten who identified themselves with the Tea Party say global warming isn’t a proven fact; most other Republicans say it is.

“This ‘no-compromise’ right wing of today’s GOP isn’t much different from the evangelical social conservatives who began asserting themselves in the party during the 1990s, and, before them, the ‘Willie Horton’ conservatives of the 1980s, and, before them, Richard Nixon’s ‘silent majority.’”

The rest of the article is here.

Gingrich kills chapter on climate change in upcoming book?

“Newt Gingrich says he has killed a chapter on climate change in a post-election book of essays about the environment. But the intended author of the chapter, who supports the scientific consensus that humans contribute to climate change, says that’s news to her.

“Katharine Hayhoe, an atmospheric scientist at Texas Tech, confirmed in an email interview that she had been asked to write a chapter on climate change for the speaker’s book.

“She said was approached by former Palm Beach Zoo CEO Terry Maple, Gingrich’s co-editor, at an annual meeting of Republicans for Environmental Protection. Asked to confirm her chapter was dropped, she replied, ‘I had not heard that.’

“The climate-change issue arose Thursday night at a Gingrich campaign stop in Carroll, when a woman expressed concern to Gingrich about the chapter. She said she had heard about it on Rush Limbaugh’s radio program.

“As she began to tell Gingrich who the author of the piece would be, Gingrich interrupted. ‘That’s not going to be in the book,” he told her. ‘We didn’t know that they were doing that and we told them to kill it.’

The rest of the article is here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 111 other followers