A new bread machine

There’s an old newsroom saying, “Have you heard about the Lindbergh kidnapping?” sarcastically responding to a reporter’s or editor’s giddy excitement over stale news.

So it goes with my excitement over a bread maker I just purchased. After all they’ve been around for years. Plus, there’s some top-notch bakers around here, from Flour Garden to Dupree’s Baking Co. to Truckee Sourdough Co.

I’ve baked bread in the oven, in a bread pan too — like Irish soda bread.

But the bread maker prices are reasonable, and I figured I could make a better loaf than what our son brings to school in his lunch. There are lots of cool recipes — zucchini, Panettone and all — so it should be fun.

One concern: I’m a longtime cook who measures more to taste than with a measuring cup. But in reading the instructions I was warned: “The MOST important rule of making bread: Use exact measurements. This is the key to successful bread baking.Yeast/Baking Powder or Baking Soda.”

Fine. I’ll report back how it turns out. All suggestions are welcome.

Referendum to challenge Nevada City loitering ordinance submitted

A neighbor Stephen Greenberg, who has learned the trick to opening the latch to our gate (I showed him once) and not letting the dog out, came to the door with this news. You have to appreciate how news travels in small towns:

Nevada City Clerk & City Council October 4, 2011
City Hall, 317 Broad St.
Nevada City, CA 95959

Re: Referendum Petition Against Nevada City Ordinance No. 2011-10

Dear City Clerk and City Council:

On behalf of the ad hoc Nevada City Voters Against the Public-Conduct Ordinance, I submit the accompanying referendum petition against the recently enacted ordinance “Regulating Conduct on Public Property.” We expect the Nevada County Elections Office to certify the petition has been signed by significantly more than the 10% necessary to suspend the ordinance and trigger the Council’s duty to reconsider it.

Please also consider this: As you know from the public hearings on the ordinance and from its predecessor’s history in 1997-98, there was — and still is — substantial opposition to the notion of creating new local crimes as a method of controlling people’s behavior. Instead of asking yourselves, “How can we convince the voters to adopt these new crimes?” why not ask, “What can we do to help people feel comfortable with each other in town?” Rather than over-policing conduct and creating criminals, why not work on enhancing accountability and public life?

If the Council decides to put this ordinance on the ballot, we’ll have to campaign against it — along with many folks who signed the petition. But we’d much rather join with you in discussing and dealing with social issues — by, e.g., expanding the Boardwalk concept to include one or more car-free zones, as architect Charles Durrett has formally proposed (“http://tinyurl.com/6dbtl6h“); supporting and expanding the Alliance for Social Health’s promising outreach work (see Sunday’s Union article, “http://tinyurl.com/6jwus2z“); promoting more communication with people in problem areas, as Councilmember Bergman has proposed; supporting Councilmember Senum’s and others’ work on NC homelessness issues; actively soliciting volunteer support for the Police Department, as Bob Lobell and the 1999 Chamber Committee Report proposed and as Grass Valley already does; developing a Positive Tickets program, as builder Greg Zaller is working on with Chief Trovato (see, e.g.,”http://positivetickets.com“); creating a volunteer task force to monitor the Commercial Street parking lot and make sure the bathrooms stay accessible; recruiting volunteers to clean and maintain the Boardwalk and parking lots … et cetera. But not by crafting a new criminal law to police behavior that’s otherwise legal.

The bottom line: we urge the Council to take the higher road, by repealing the ordinance.

Sincerely,

CONTACT _Con-43DB7B8C1 \c \s \l Stephen Greenberg (for Ben, Chad, Chuck, Darin, Rahlene, Robert, Robert, and Val)

PAGE 2

Stephen Greenberg
P.O. Box 754
Nevada City, CA 95959-0754
(530) 265-3696 sgberg@pacbell.net

Cal professor wins Nobel Prize

I received this email, which is a needed boost to the UCs. My 30th class reunion is this fall, I’m also being reminded in “snail mailings” to our house:

Dear Friends of the College of Letters & Science:

You have probably heard the wonderful news, but I am excited to tell you that Berkeley’s Saul Perlmutter was today awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for “the discovery of the accelerating expansion of the Universe through observations of distant supernovae.” Please join me in congratulating Saul and his research team in this well deserved honor.

You can read the Berkeley press release at
http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2011/10/04/saul-perlmutter-awarded-2011-nobel-prize-in-physics/.

Sincerely,

Mark Richards
Executive Dean and
Dean, Mathematical & Physical Sciences
College of Letters & Science

Cozy relationships and “peer benchmarking” send CEOs pay soaring

“As the board of Amgen convened at the company’s headquarters in March, chief executive Kevin W. Sharer seemed an unlikely candidate for a raise,” according to the Washington Post.

“Shareholders at the company, one of the nation’s largest biotech firms, had lost 3 percent on their investment in 2010 and 7 percent over the past five years. The company had been forced to close or shrink plants, trimming the workforce from 20,100 to 17,400. And Sharer, a 63-year-old former Navy engineer, was already earning lots of money — about $15 million in the previous year, plus such perks as two corporate jets.

“The board decided to give Sharer more. It boosted his compensation to $21 million annually, a 37 percent increase, according to the company reports.

“Why?

“The company board agreed to pay Sharer more than most chief executives in the industry — with a compensation ‘value closer to the 75th percentile of the peer group,’ according to a 2011 regulatory filing.

“This is how it’s done in corporate America. At Amgen and at the vast majority of large U.S. companies, boards aim to pay their executives at levels equal to or above the median for executives at similar companies.

“The idea behind setting executive pay this way, known as ‘peer benchmarking,” is to keep talented bosses from leaving.’

The rest of the article is here.

Report: How local newspapers are being repudiated

“A new study shows the dramatic degree to which consumers under the age of 40 have repudiated newspapers,” according to Newsosaur, written by longtime journalist and CEO Alan Mutter.

The must-read report, which was released Monday by the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism, found an alarming disconnect between younger and older consumers in the value they put on newspapers as sources of information about their communities.

Pew split the 2,251 respondents to its poll between those aged 18 to 39 and those 40 and older.

When asked by researchers to identify their preferred source for crime news, 44% of those in the 40-plus category named newspapers, as compared with just 23% for the younger cohort.

Pew also found this sobering statistic: Fully 69% of respondents said it would not “have a major impact” on their ability to keep up with news about their community if their local paper no longer existed.

The rest of the article is here.

The report is here.

Romney still “running in place”

“Rick Perry’s fading, Herman Cain’s surging and what about Mitt Romney? He’s running in place,” as ABC News reports.

“The past and present Republican front-runner is back on top of a fresh ABC News-Washington Post poll out today, but he hasn’t moved an inch since last month. In September, Romney was the choice of 25 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents in our poll, and one month later, he’s still the choice of 25 percent of them.

“Compare that steadiness to the volatility of former front-runner Rick Perry, whose support plummeted from 29 percent last month to 16 percent in October.

“And then there’s the 2012 race’s current ‘it’ candidate Herman Cain who quadrupled his support in the span of one month, blasting off from 4 percent in September to 16 percent in today’s poll.

“So where does Romney go from here? While Romney might not be lighting anyone on fire, one Romney aide told our John Berman, ‘It takes somebody to beat somebody.’ And lucky for the former Massachusetts governor, nobody yet seems to be the ‘somebody’ who is a breakout choice.

The rest of the article is here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 110 other followers